Is More Business Investment Going to Get Us Out of the
For those fed up with five years of Keynesian pump-priming, the recent
attention given to business investment in Canada is a welcome change.
Anybody familiar with Say’s Law knows that “sustaining aggregate demand”
through increased consumer and government spending is not what brings
about economic growth. More investment in productive capacity does.
Thus, in remarks following a recent speech in London, Ontario, Bank of
Canada governor Mark Carney
assured us that dependence on the housing market and consumer debt
is giving way to “solid business investment.” Although Statistics Canada
noted a slowing down of business investment intentions for 2013 in
a February report, Financial Post editorialist Terence
Corcoran had earlier found indications of strong growth in business
loans in the Bank of Canada’s aggregated data, as households seem to be
“This is where real economic growth comes from,”
he wrote. “The credit indicators suggest what the economy needs is
what it is about to get.” (FP, January 13, 2013)
There is no question that more business credit and investment is better
than more household debt, and especially more government debt, which is
generally pure consumption and brings little long-term benefit, despite
all the government propaganda to the contrary. But is more business
investment always a good thing?
What aggregated data don’t show is if the money is being invested in
profitable processes that will answer a real and sustainable demand.
With hindsight, someone praising the growth of investments in the
high-tech sector in 1998 on the grounds that it will improve the
economy’s productive capacity appears hopelessly naive to us. We know
that the bubble popped three years later and that billions of dollars
worth of misdirected investments were then lost.
Thanks to Mr. Carney and his central bank colleagues, there is growing
evidence that the same phenomenon is happening, with the US once again
leading the way.
CNBC ran a very enlightening report last month on how the Federal
Reserve’s cheap money policies are allowing poorly rated companies to
get low-cost financing (“Fed
Throws Junk Bond Lifeline to Weak Companies,” March 15).
You might think that after all the risky investments that went wrong in
recent years with subprime, asset-backed securities and the like, a boom
in junk bonds would be the last thing we’d be entertaining as the
economy recovers. But junk bond volume is more than double what it was
in the pre-financial crisis days of 2007, and spreads between junk bond
yields and their benchmark measuring sticks are at their lowest since
then. (Due to the risk they entail, junk bonds usually offer a much
higher yield – or interest rate – than other, safer types of
investments. But because they are becoming so popular, their prices are
going up and their yields are consequently going down, closer to that of
other assets with which they are being compared.)
“Adding digital zeros to
numbers on bank computers doesn’t make more real resources
available for investments. Creating a billion dollars out of
thin air doesn’t make new trucks, steel beams or computer
programmers suddenly appear. It only creates more claims on
According to the report, junk bond issuance stands at a historic mark of
$108.5 billion globally, buoyed by central banks pursuing the same
policies of low interest rates and money creation as the Fed.
This is only one small indication among many others that scarce
resources may not be going to their optimal uses, just as was the case
during the high-tech boom of the 1990s and the real estate boom of the
More fundamentally, it should be clear that a larger flow of credit by
itself doesn’t mean much in this era of wild and unprecedented monetary
inflation. Easy credit is available for everybody, with household
indebtedness reaching records levels in Canada and governments drowning
in debt everywhere. Meanwhile, record low interest rates discourage
people from saving. Where does all this credit come from?
In his London speech, Carney praised the high level of trust in Canada’s
banking system since the crisis, which led commercial banks to create
even more credit through the agency of fractional reserve. This trust,
he said, “multiplies base money created by the central bank many
times, creating an aggregate credit supply that finances our modern
Like almost everyone nowadays apart from Austrian School economists,
Carney believes that multiplying the volume of credit will benefit the
economy, whether or not this credit derives from real savings on the
part of consumers.
But adding digital zeros to numbers on bank computers doesn’t make more
real resources available for investments. Creating a billion dollars out
of thin air doesn’t make new trucks, steel beams or computer programmers
suddenly appear. It only creates more claims on existing resources.
This is precisely how the cycle of booms and busts is being fed. As
Ludwig von Mises and Friedrich Hayek taught long ago, artificially low
interest rates and abundant phony credit gives the impression that lots
of resources have been set aside to fund new productive processes, when
this is actually not the case. This leads to all kinds of questionable
investment projects, which need to be liquidated when they are revealed
to be unprofitable as the boom peters out. The effects of the cycle are
only worsened and prolonged when governments try to prevent the
liquidation of unsustainable projects through bailouts and massive
This is the third time we go through this wrenching cycle of economic
dislocation in under two decades. Although the Austrian analysis is much
more widely understood today than in the early 2000s, governments and
most economists still count on the same inflationist and Keynesian magic
tricks to kick-start the economy. How many times will we need to repeat
them before it becomes obvious that these remedies don’t work?
From the same author
Quinze années de crise, quinze années de progrès
308 – 15 février 2013)
Milton Friedman aurait-il eu les bons réflexes face à
la crise économique?
297 – 15 février 2012)
La balloune Legault se dégonfle
287 – 15 mars 2011)
Conservateur? Libertarien? Néolibéral de droite?
287 – 15 mars 2011)
Telecom Policy: Tony Clement's confusion
287 – March 15, 2011)
First written appearance of the
word 'liberty,' circa 2300 B.C.
Le Québécois Libre
Promoting individual liberty, free markets and voluntary
cooperation since 1998.