Montréal,  20 nov. - 3 déc. 1999
Numéro 50
 
  (page 8) 
 
 
page précédente 
           Vos commentaires  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
MOT POUR MOT
  
DES FÉMINISTES
PAS COMME LES AUTRES
 
 
          Au cours des dernières décennies, le mouvement féministe est passé d'une force progressiste à une force réactionnaire en Amérique du Nord. Les féministes ne demandent plus simplement l'égalité avec les hommes, mais exigent aussi des privilèges, des protections spéciales, des quotas d'emploi, un traitement plus favorable lors de procédures légales, une répression contre le comportement masculin traditionnel, un environnement social où toute connotation sexuelle est supprimée, etc.  
   
          Qui plus est, les organisations féministes comme la Fédération des femmes du Québec sont devenues des lobbys socialistes subventionnés par les gouvernements et faisant la promotion de l'idéologie étatiste, sous le couvert de la défense des intérêts des femmes les plus démunies.
 
 
          Y a-t-il encore une pertinence à se dire féministe lorsqu'on rejette cette orientation? Des Américaines qui se définissent comme « individualist feminists » ou « ifeminists » pensent que oui. L'auteure Wendy McElroy a conçu un site où elles proposent de retourner à ces valeurs de liberté et d'égalité de droit entre les individus, hommes et femmes, qui constituaient les fondements du féminisme au 19e siècle. Les questions/réponses qui suivent sont contenues dans la section FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) du site ifeminists.com. 
  
  
  
What is individualist feminism?   
Individualist feminism advocates the equal treatment of men and women as individuals under just law. The core principle of individualist feminism is that all human beings have a moral and legal claim to their own persons and property. It is sometimes called libertarian feminism.   
  

What is « just » law?   
Just laws are those that protect the person and property of peaceful individuals – for example, laws against rape. Unjust laws are those that infringe upon the freedom of peaceful individuals – for example, laws against consensual adult sex acts.   
  

Why call yourself a « feminist? » Why not just call yourself an individualist?   
Being a feminist is a form of specialization. In fighting for individual rights, some people focus upon injustice to women just as others focus upon injustice to gays or children.   
  

Sometimes the inequality works to women's advantage, as in affirmative action laws. Do you oppose them as well?   
Absolutely. Equality means neither privilege nor oppression. Besides which, it hardly benefits women to have a paternalistic state treat them as children or « lesser » human beings who need state assistance to become equal.   
  

Isn't government trying to help women?   
Governments have been the greatest violators of women's rights for centuries. In the 18th and 19th centuries in America, government denied to women the most basic rights of controlling their own bodies (e.g. birth control) and their own property (e.g. wives did not have an uncontested claim to their own wages). By the late 20th century, government cemented gender hostility into society by assuming a paternalistic role that advantaged women at the expense of men (e.g. affirmative action). Whether through privilege or oppression, governments seem unwilling to respect the full and equal individual rights of women.   
  

Opposing affirmative action and defending property rights is generally associated with conservatives. Isn't individualist feminism just conservative feminism?   
Many conservatives are uncomfortable with the way individualist feminism embraces radical civil liberties. For example, it calls for the decriminalization of prostitution and pornography. To an individualist feminist, there is no schism between economic and civil liberties. They are both expressions of an individual's right to use her own body and property in any peaceful manner she chooses.   
  

Does this mean individualist feminism supports abortion rights?   
This is a controversy within individualist feminism. The majority of opinion is pro-choice on the grounds of a woman's self-ownership. A vocal minority within individualist feminism, however, oppose abortion. They believe that the developing fetus can rightfully claim the same human rights as a newborn baby.   
  

This sounds like a new feminism. Where does it come from?   
Individualist feminism is enjoying a new revival, but its roots go back to the anti-slavery movement of the 19th century. In working for the equal rights of slaves, female abolitionists asked themselves « do we not have a claim to such rights ourselves? » When these women began to lecture and write on their own behalf, individualist feminism (as a movement in America) was born.  

  
  
Mot pour mot précédents
 
 
 
sommaire
PRÉSENT NUMÉRO 
page suivante